THE ABSOLUTELY STUNNING TRUTH THE IRS DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW. "This information, if truly understood and effectuated by the American public, could limit government faster than any electoral result or any half-baked reform scheme coming out of Washington D.C." Please do NOT miss any of the embedded URLS to understand the corrupt cartel that continues to target the political opponents of the current criminal administration.
THE SHOCKING TRUTH THE IRS DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW. The limited nature of the 'income' tax...
Buried in Supreme Court rulings, legal minutia, tax code jargon, and the minutes from Congressional hearings is the truth that the what is commonly referred to as the income tax is meant to be a simple excise tax levied on those benefiting in some way from a federal privilege.
This means that government workers and office-holders, federal reserve bankers, subsidy recipients, investors in federal corporations, and any other person benefiting from the profitable exercise of federal privilege were meant to pay the tax, NOT independent hard-working American citizens.
RELEVANT COURT HEARINGS:
"...in Spinger v. U. S., 102 W.U. 568 (1880), it was held that [the] tax upon gains, profits, and income was an excise tax or duty, and not a direct tax, within the meaning of the constitution, and that its imposition was not, therefore, unconstitutional." - United States Supreme Court, Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust, 158 U.S. 601 (1895)
"...taxation on income was in its nature an excise entitled to be enforces as such," United States Supreme Court, Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), quoting and reiterating language used in its ruling in Pollock v. Farmer's Loan and Trust
IT DID NOT CHANGE AFTER 16TH AMENDMENT:
"The provisions of the Sixteenth Amendment conferred no new power of taxation..." - Stanton vs. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916)
"The Sixteenth Amendment, although referred to in argument, has no real bearing and may be put out of view. As pointed out in recent decisions, it does not extend the taxing power to new or excepted subjects..." - Peck vs. Lowe, 247 U.S. 165 (1918)
“The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such. It is an excise tax with respect to certain activities and privileges which is measured by reference to the income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of tax.”
–F. Morse Hubbard, Treasury Dept legislative draftsman. House Congressional Record, March 27, 1943
These findings, along with other research meticulously gathered by Pete Hendrickson and presented in Cracking the Code, outline the limited nature of the income tax. This information, if truly understood and effectuated by the American public, could limit government faster than any electoral result or any half-baked reform scheme coming out of Washington D.C.
In 'Free Speech on Trial,' you will see the lengths to which the minions of the corrupt federal system will stoop to tread upon the rights of freedom-loving Americans and keep their illicit scam under wraps.
Buy the book 'Cracking the Code' and learn how to get your rightful earnings back from the federal criminals - http://www.losthorizons.com/cc.htm
Support Doreen Hendrickson financially as her family appeals the terrible injustice that has been perpetrated upon her - http://www.gofundme.com/DoreenRelief
==========
The late Andrew Russo is famous for his documentary Freedom to Fascism, which you can view here. In the documentary, he exposes the Internal Revenues tactics to force people to pay income tax, even getting an interview with the former head of the IRS, who was unable to cite the law that requires US citizens to fill out a tax return. Now, a citizen video and book are looking to set the record straight and inform the public for the sake of making real change in the tax system. Keep in mind as you read the article that this is not just about the IRS and tax returns. It's also about the First Amendment.
Ford Fisher writes at Solutions Institute:
On July 25, 2014, Doreen Hendrickson was convicted of contempt of court. She was recently sentenced to 18 months, and surrendered herself to prison on May 15, 2015. The details of the case were bizarre, to say the least.
Doreen's husband, Pete Hendrickson, is the author of Cracking the Code: The Fascinating Truth about Taxation in America, a book that encourages an allegedly legal but unconventional way of filing tax returns, which has supposedly helped tens of thousands of readers win their money back from the IRS. While the book and documentary goes into much heavier detail, the compact of his premise is that the income tax was only meant to be applied to government employees, and private citizens can avoid income taxation by referencing this distinction.
Doreen and Pete have been using this method to avoid paying income tax since the release of Pete's book, and it's put them at odds with the IRS. In the recent case, Doreen was given a new set of returns filled out by the federal government and ordered to sign them as being her own testimony. Because they were not her own words, she refused, and has now been sentenced to prison.
Here's the problem in all of this, Mrs. Hendrickson was not charged with tax evasion nor was she charged with falsifying her tax returns. She was charged with contempt of court because she would not sign a document that she did not believe to be true.
"I am accused by the government of having committed a crime for refusing to obey an order to swear to facts I do not believe are true," said Hendrickson. "I agreed to obey the order if I could also simply add to my signature that I had been ordered by a judge to swear to the facts. That didn't suit the government however. Not only must I obey an order to swear to something I do not believe, but I am not allowed to indicate that I've been ordered to swear under threat of imprisonment."
Of course, people in the united States have been paying taxes and filling out income tax returns for decades now. Surely, there must be a law someone can point to that requires American citizens to provide such returns. So far no law is in place.
Peter Hendrickson wrote, "The limited nature of the income tax is not a matter of my opinion. In addition to the clear words of the law, dozens of United States Supreme Court rulings agree with my research and analysis, while no Supreme Court rulings support any alternative view, including the broad misunderstanding of the law the IRS likes to encourage."
Hendrickson also said that his wife was not allowed to reference Supreme Court cases to demonstrate her innocence before a jury of her peers. The judge even taunted her during her opening statement.
In writing about Hendrickson's case in a book titled Motor City Witchcraft Trials, court-watcher Brian Wright wrote, "The current lot of judges at all levels has deteriorated into yes men to whatever mobster, especially federal with DHS and the national security state apparatus, tells them to dance."
Now, a new documentary by Ford Fisher and Shane Trejo seeks to expose the corruption of the IRS, the limited nature of "income" tax and the attacks of the First Amendment. The video highlights the now infamous IRS v. Hendrickson case. View it below and share it with your friends on social media.
