Analyst's note: Absolutely must see. I had two friends separately point me to this article. I had NOT seen the article prior to that time. But having now read it and considering all of the related material that we have reported here, I have little doubt that it could well be true. This is the kind of thing that we've been finding and reporting. I personally ran into globalist (some in uniform, some were civilians -- all were high ranking individuals) back when I was briefing high-level Department of Defense officials and others about what later became known as Information Warfare. President Clinton eventually killed that term ... since he didn't like the term warfare associated with the concepts that were being discussed and developed. As for the ulitimate truth of this article only time will tell.
We recently reported in Hero U.S. General: Obama is following Castro's plan
"(General) Boykin laid out a step-by-step plan he says is the model of how Fidel Castro instituted Marxism in Cuba, Mao Zedong in China, Stalin in Russia and Hugo Chavez in Venzeula:
- Nationalize major sectors of the economy
- Redistribute wealth
- Discredit opposition
- Censors opposing viewpoints
- Control gun ownership
- Develop a constabulary force to control civilian population
Boykin then illustrates how each of these steps have begun to materialize in the U.S.: From a form of “nationalization” through government bailouts, to “hate crime” legislation aimed at silencing the pulpits, to the federal government labeling tea partiers and veterans returning from overseas as potential domestic terrorists, to efforts underway to get the U.S. on board with a United Nations small arms treaty, which would regulate private gun ownership.
Boykin takes particular aim at Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which he says federal administrators have already admitted is a wealth-redistribution plan (step No. 2) and he says includes within its 1,000 pages plans for national security forces at the president’s disposal, akin to national police forces socialist tyrants like Adolf Hitler used to complete their revolutions.
Specifically, Boykin alluded to a speech Obama made four years ago today, in Colorado Springs, Colo., on July 2, 2008, in which he pledged to establish a “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the U.S. military].” [....]
If you remember back in the article Obama Appoints 'Responsibility to Protect' Champion Samantha Power to Chair Genocide Panel we reported:
Extremely troubling. Samantha Power, Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights, is likely the most dangerous woman on earth. Some wonder if she will use her newest position on the Atrocities Prevention Board “as a tool to de-legitimize Israel” or "invest in the new state of Palestine."
Will someone please explain what Samantha Power's (Mrs. Cass Sunstein) qualifications were to have permitted her to have been conceiving and suggesting military actions that directly impacted our national security and the ultimate deaths of our sons and daughters who are Warriors? Does being the wife of Cass Sunstein – Obama Regulatory Czar (University of Chicago) provide that knowledge and experience -- I think not! Cass Sunstein just wants to "nudge" our society toward socialism and other crazy ideas ... what could possibly go wrong with that idea? Now she is going to "Chair a Genocide Panel?"
This article portents a bad movie script. It will continue using your children and relatives as "extras" -- those who wear the uniform of our U.S. military -- and it is being funded with our tax money. It will likely involve all the usual socialist/Marxist actors from Barack Hussan Obama (or whatever his name really is .... former community organizer now masquerading as U.S. President) to George Soros, Samuel Berger (Bill Clinton's former national security advisor), George J. Mitchell (former U.S. Senate Majority Leader), Javier Solana (a socialist activist who is NATO's former secretary-general as well as the former foreign affairs minister of Spain), Samantha Power, to Zbigniew Brzezinski (Jimmy Carter's national security advisor).
No doubt like many of our readers, I look forward to PART II of the article provided below.
==================================================================================================
For the first time in over two years of ongoing interviews, a powerful and highly influential Wall Street insider allows for direct interview participation of a figure we will simply call “Military Insider”. What follows is the first of a two part interview with both of these individuals who are warning of an impending manufactured crisis within the United States by powers desperate to secure a second term for “the man calling himself Obama”. For those who have followed these insider interviews from the beginning – you know just how accurate they have proven to be. Please remind yourself of that as you read this latest discussion.
PART ONE:
UM: Can we begin?
WSI: (Broad smile) Yes – and might I just say this before we do…it is so very nice to see you again in person.
UM: I’m just as glad to see you looking so much better. Out of the woods?
WSI: No-no…at my age one is always “in the woods” if you will. But at this point, I’m not helping to fertilize the trees just yet! (laughs)
UM: Why did you decide to invite him here? I’m glad – honored, to have them here, but can you explain…briefly explain why you’ve done this?
WSI: Certainly. I invited…I guess that term is sufficient…I invited them here for no other reason than to have what they know and what their experience tells them – I wanted that perspective to now be included in this from the first person. I…we…-name deleted- and I decided it would be best, when possible, to have this information come to you without the filter of our own interpretations.
UM: How long have you known each other?
WSI: (Looks over at MI) That would be…nearly twenty years? Perhaps a bit more?
MI: Twenty three years.
WSI: That long? Really?
MI: Just over twenty-three years. That’s correct.
UM: Have you known –name deleted- that long as well?
MI: No.
WSI: I introduced them…it wasn’t more than a few years ago. Shortly after the election…in 2008. Shortly after –name deleted- told me there had been a terrible mistake made. That Obama being elected had been a terrible mistake. Then I began hearing similar things from him…the concern that was…mounting within the military and intelligence community regarding the new president.
UM: Can you expand on that? Those concerns. What were they?
WSI: You’ve already – we’ve already been down that path. A number of times.
UM: I’d like to hear it from him. If that’s ok. Their perspective. Unfiltered. Like you just said you wanted.
(Military Insider looks at WSI)
WSI: If they wish to share that with you…that is certainly fine. But I would caution there is a great deal of information that this interview is to…coordinate with your own efforts…you may not want to spend too much time rehashing what was. I would rather concentrate on what I now know that is going to be…or what some hope is to be.
UM: We’ve got time – I really want to hear them describe these concerns. It’s those concerns that pushed us to this point, right? So if you’re comfortable with that – please…you can be brief if you want…but tell us a bit about those concerns back then. After 2008. Or before 2008 if there were concerns before then.
MI: There were.
UM: Concerns? Before 2008? About Obama?
MI: Yes.
UM: What were they?
MI: The first real warning was Mr. Obama’s carpet bombing villages comment against the military. That…I apologize for the term…that pissed all of us off – or most of us. At least those of us not put in place by the communists. The pro-union…the pro-Big Labor faction.
UM: Did you just say communists? In the U.S. military?
MI: Yes.
UM: Please – can you please explain that.
MI: Communists. Communist supporters. Sympathizers. Or socialists. Or globalists might be the right…a more accurate term. Big government…One World…that whole concept. It’s real. As real these chairs. That wall. The air in your lungs.
UM: Agenda 21? That conspiracy theory? And the United States military?
MI: Yes – not a conspiracy. It’s real. It exists. And it’s happening right now.
UM: Agenda 21 is non-binding.
MI: That is…not accurate.
UM: No – it’s a non-binding agreement. It’s…it was more a show than anything of substance.
MI: No sir. You are wrong. Your dismissal…that was the outcome…that was the intended outcome of calling it that.
UM: What?
MI: Non-binding. Voluntary.
UM: But that’s what it is – it was a non-binding bullsh-t agreement for the environmentalists.
MI: It’s only as non-binding as the executives who will use the authority granted within that document choose to act on that authority.
UM: What?
MI: That document was a blueprint. Have you actually read it?
UM: Not…not all of it. No.
MI: Then why are you presuming to know what it is – or isn’t?
UM: I wasn’t presuming – or…I was trying to get around the idea of communists running the United States military.
MI: That’s not what I said.
UM: You just did – that’s…yes, that’s what you just said.
MI: No.
UM: Ok…you explain to me what you just said. About the communists, the globalists…all of that. What did you say?
MI: You posed a question about warnings regarding Mr. Obama? Before the 2008 election.
UM: Yeah – and you said that pissed off the military – at least those not put in place by the communists. That’s what you said. Right?
MI: Yes.
UM: So – what’s the problem?
MI: What I did not say was that communists were running the United States military. You said that. Not me.
UM: What’s the difference?
MI: Communists, Big Labor, globalists…those factions have infiltrated the U.S. military. They are not running the U.S. military. That is a distinction of epic proportions. You may not fully appreciated the difference but in my world – all due respect…in my world…BIG DIFFERENCE.
WSI: And this plan…the globalization of the American military…it’s been planned, slowly implemented…for a long time. It’s been happening right under our noses.
UM: It began with Agenda 21 – during the Clinton era?
MI: Incorrect.
UM: What?
MI: Agenda 21 did not begin during the Clinton era. It was developed long before that. In fact, it culminated under President Bush. HW.
WSI: But it goes back much farther than that. I only learned of this more recently myself.
MI: Yes sir – much farther. Decades of planning. A multiple series of five year plans.
UM: Five year plans?
WSI: Just like Stalin. A slow progression…a creeping monster that comes in five year increments. Cutting away at freedom and liberty and individuality.
MI: Yes sir. Just like that.
UM: So how far back does this Agenda 21 go?
MI: You are admitting you don’t know – but you were just attempting to explain to ME, what Agenda 21 was really about.
UM: Fair enough – I apologize for that.
MI: Accepted.
WSI: He’s like me – getting up to speed as it were. Please – continue.
MI: Yes sir.
(Pause)
Decades ago. The first official mark goes back to the early 1970’s. The birth of the modern environmental movement. Are you aware that the protection of the environment was placed as the most important issue – more than freedom, sovereignty of nations…environmentalism became the fixture of a full on assault against any nation’s own self determination.
Those who have spoken out against Agenda 21 – and there have been members of the military and intelligence communities who have…they understood the implications. These people are not conspiracy nuts. These people are patriots who understand the threat. The country – the United States, is under siege. It has been going on for a long time. Decades of planning. And now the planning stage is being transitioned into the implementation stage. Right now. It’s happening now.
WSI: And you are absolutely convinced of that? It’s happening now – the election of Barack Obama was the signal? Implementation of this globalization plan commenced at that time? Fully commenced? Right?
MI: Yes sir.
UM: How? (Pause) The…implementation? How does that work. By force? Using our own military against us?
MI: No. That would be too much of a risk…most of our military personnel are good men and women. They signed up. They took an oath. And they are doing their job. Remember, I indicated some inside the military were part of this globalization movement. Not all. Not most. But some.
UM: But some of these inside the military – they have influence?
MI: Yes. Appointed to positions of authority. By this administration.
UM: The Secretary of State? Panetta? I thought he was the real hero of the Bin Laden raid?
MI: He acted outside his direct authority. That action had little to nothing to do with the best interests of the United States.
UM: What do you mean?
MI: (Looks toward WSI)
UM: (Repeats question) What do you mean?
WSI: What they mean to say…if I may interject…is that Mr. Panetta’s motivations were…perhaps, a bit more… uncertain than many of us are comfortable admitting to. The fact he is a Clintonite means a great deal to –name deleted-. It means nothing to me. Nothing.
UM: So you don’t trust him?
WSI: No – I do not. I’ve never trusted any of them.
UM: Who?
WSI: Politicians. That’s much of my reason for never voting in an election. I find them all distasteful to some degree. Even the best of them.
UM: But you’re voting this time – in 2012.
WSI: That’s correct. While I find most politicians distasteful…I find the man calling himself Obama to be something else entirely.
UM: And what’s that?
WSI: Dangerous.
UM: So you’ve said – but getting back to the Agenda 21 thing…this whole globalization concept…it’s difficult to wrap my head around all of it without coming off…without sounding…
WSI: Crazy?
UM: Yeah – crazy.
WSI: That’s how it’s intended. Do that which you intend, and if any oppose that which you intend…mock them into submission while continuing on with your work. Call it outlandish, crazy, ridiculous, preposterous, all the while – continue doing the very thing they accuse of.
These Obama people are quite good at that.
UM: So the globalization thing…the plan…Agenda 21…it’s not just a Democrat thing?
MI: Correct.
UM: Republicans have gone along with it too?
MI: Correct. Let me clarify that a bit. If that’s ok?
UM: Please do.
MI: The architects are embedded within the various liberal sub groups, all of which are under the umbrella of today’s Democratic Party. They have been the ones to push this agenda – THE AGENDA…for the past several decades. There are Republicans…there have been Republicans, sympathetic to the superficial aspects of the plan.
(Long pause)
UM: You lost me. I get the liberal groups…I will assume the unions, the environmental groups…they are all in on the globalization plan. I get that. What do you mean by the superficial aspects of the plan? The…that part of it that attracts some Republicans?
WSI: If I may?
MI: Yes sir.
WSI: This is where the big money comes into play. Take for example, General Electric. A huge corporation with multiple subsidiaries…it is itself, a working, breathing, functioning, ever-evolving manifestation of this globalization movement. Massive amounts of dollars are spent developing public relations campaigns that infest the very fabric of the public conscience. Movies, television, music, fashion, consumable goods…it all becomes part of the implementation plan. Global cooling becomes global warming becomes climate change becomes sustainable resources…each of those are reading from the very same script.
And so as these concepts grow in popularity among the public…politicians bend their own vision to those concepts. They may do so not knowing of course the true motivations of those who have invented said concepts, but nevertheless, they become tools of the plan. They become that all-important “bi-partisan” support of those plans.
UM: So what’s the purpose of all of it? The plan? Globalization? Why? What’s the end goal?
WSI: First, and for us at this very moment, most important – is the total and irreversible transformation of the United States. If that is achieved – as the man calling himself Obama and all those who support him and have placed him in the White House…if that is achieved, then we are looking at a true one-world government ruled by a small group of elite who will control all aspects of production, dissemination of resources, how you are born, how you live, and how and when you are to die. There is a group who believes they will have a seat at that table of power – Big Labor, particular globalized financial institutions, certain business entities, they all share in a belief that the individual is simply too dumb, too un-evolved, to have to suffer through life on their own. They want to be told what to do. What to think. How to live.
UM: (turning to MI) Do you agree with that – it’s really that far-reaching? That’s where President Obama wants to take America? Take the world?
MI: Yes. I know it.
UM: How?
MI: (Looks to WSI)
WSI: Go ahead.
MI: Approximately two years ago…not quite two years ago…I received information pertaining to an election contingency plan. For 2012. After the 2010 elections there were particular operatives…specific to the Obama administration and Democratic Party leadership…indicating an overwhelming need to secure a second term for President Obama. That document’s title was…(pauses)
WSI: He can be trusted – I give you my word. Please proceed.
MI: That document’s title was “By Any Means Necessary”. It was unofficial – but we know it came directly from channels specific to the administration. We confirmed that.
UM: What channels? Who are you talking about?
MI: We believe it to have been authored by Mr. Sunstein. Reviewed and approved by Valerie Jarrett. Preparations for implementation are being done in part by Mr. Leo Gerard coordinating with…with high ranking officials within the Department of Justice, Homeland Security…and…the U.S. military.
UM: Leo Gerard? The union leader? How would he play a part in this?
WSI: Mr. Gerard has direct experience in toppling a government working directly with similar forces that would be in play here in the United States. You did some work on that…perhaps look more closely at what exactly happened in Brazil. It was a coup. An overthrow of government. A joint effort between Big Labor and certain business groups in which law enforcement helped facilitate the final push.
Brazil was a regime change orchestrated by Leo Gerard and soon after personally and financially congratulated by the President of the United States.
What is now being planned for the United States is not regime change – but the final implementation… and to use the words of the man calling himself Obama, the fundamental transformation of the United States of America that can only be assured by a second presidential term.
That plan to ensure a second Obama term as it has been titled, is to take place “By Any Means Necessary”.
Just think all that so many are going through to find out who this man really is that now calls himself Barack Hussein Obama. I just this past week we find Obama's Kenyan Birth Records Discovered In British National Archives and Sheriff Joe's long-awaited press conference on Mr. Obama's birth certificate released by the Obama White house in April 2011. Don't miss the video of the Sheriff's press briefing. Just who did the American people elect to the office of President. Was he qualified as a "natural born citizen?" Fraudlent documents related to one who calls himself Obama and now sits in the American White House continue to be found. Why?
Thanks to the first official law-enforcement probe of Barack Obama’s eligibility, headed by Maricopa County (Ariz.) Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his investigative team – as well as the ongoing investigative reporting of Dr. Jerome Corsi and the entire WND editorial team – there is still a chance to finally get to the truth about crucial questions regarding Obama that tens of millions of Americans want answered.
The video below is said to have be "pulled" from use on Fox News Sunday
Now we know why Fox News never broadcast it as they originally planned to.
*Don't you remember all the notices we kept getting to watch Fox News on Sunday at 9PM? What Happened?*
*This is the clip that got pulled due to pressure from the Administration.*
Obama Puts Heat on Fox News to Prevent Sean Hannity* *airing this piece.
*This is a video that Sean Hannity of FOX News has been trying to show that we are told has consistently been blocked by the Obama Administration for several weeks.*
*Watch it now before it gets pulled from the internet! *
